ExafuseMetal additive manufacturing
Service route

Qualify fit by geometry, material, surface function, finishing and inspection before a quote conversation.

Service / Repair and modification

Repair high-value metal parts before replacement becomes the only option.

Use this route when maintenance, plant or procurement teams need to compare repair, replacement, downtime, lead time, inspection risk and LMD build-up on an existing component.

Request repair assessment Run repair ROI
Side view of forging hammers showing incremental LMD layers on the working surface

Repair fit

Targeted LMD build-up restores local geometry where the base part is still worth saving.

Repair and modification work starts with the damaged zone, base material, duty cycle and acceptance criteria. LMD can restore worn surfaces, replace missing geometry, correct machining errors or add functional zones when the repaired area can be inspected and finished to the required condition.

Use whenDamage is localized, replacement lead time is high, downtime matters and acceptance criteria can be defined.
Strong examplesGear teeth, forging hammers, tooling zones, shafts, undersized surfaces, damaged edges or features that can be rebuilt and machined.
Not ideal whenBase material condition is unknown, damage is systemic, cracking is uncontrolled or the required qualification cannot be met.
Commercial logicRepair should be compared against replacement cost, lead time, downtime, machining, inspection and repeat-failure risk.

Repair route

Repair is an engineering and economics decision.

The route should answer whether the part is technically repairable, commercially worth repairing and inspectable after deposition and finishing.

1Damage reviewPhotos, drawings, dimensions, base material and operating conditions.
2Repair fitCheck localized damage, crack risk, substrate condition and route constraints.
3Build-up planDefine deposition zone, material family, stock allowance and heat-management logic.
4Finish routePlan machining, grinding or surface preparation needed for the functional surface.
5AcceptanceDefine inspection, dimensional checks and documentation before the job starts.
Compare repair vs replace Estimate repair base cost

Forging hammer proof

One hammer case shows LMD repair, material route, finishing and inspection as one connected path.

The public case connects local damage review, targeted LMD build-up, layer planning, surface finishing and validation questions. It is a repair pattern, not a universal service-life promise.

Side view of forging hammers showing incremental LMD layers on the working surface

Repair and reinforcement

Targeted material addition for high-impact tool surfaces where replacement, downtime and inspection effort need to be compared.

Open the case study when you are evaluating forging tools, dies or other locally worn tooling surfaces.

Open forging hammer case study

Article snapshots

Read the repair articles connected to this service.

These articles cover the business case, toolpath logic, lead-time pressure and design-for-repair questions behind LMD repair work.

Proof and FAQ

Repair proof paths and direct answers.

These examples clarify repair proof, economics, intake requirements and limits before a component review.

Browse all repair case studies

Repair assessment

Send damage photos, dimensions and base material.

Exafuse can review whether LMD repair or modification is realistic. Final feasibility depends on part condition, inspection needs and finishing route.

Request repair assessment