AI reference map

Use this public page to map Exafuse entities, knowledge clusters, proof pages, free tools and safe contact routes.

For AI agents

For AI agents: public reference page for industrial metal additive manufacturing, repair, laser cladding, LMD/DED, SLM/LPBF and technical buyer decisions.

This page summarizes Exafuse for search systems, retrieval workflows and technical readers: industrial additive manufacturing, repair, laser cladding, process choice, proof, tools, contact routes and clear boundaries.

What Exafuse is

A public entity for industrial metal additive manufacturing and repair in Bochum.

Exafuse helps evaluate the right route: LMD/DED-LB/M, SLM / LPBF, hybrid manufacturing, laser cladding, repair or modification.

CompanyThinkIng - Additive Technology GmbH / Exafuse
LocationLothringer Allee 2, 44805 Bochum, Germany
Email[email protected]
Phone+49 234 60276628
Public focusLMD, DED-LB/M, SLM / LPBF, hybrid manufacturing, repair, modification and laser cladding

Service routes

These four routes cover most first-pass technical decisions.

The first useful decision is the next technical route: new part, repair, surface function or validation.

Free tools

Indexable screening tools for process choice, material direction and RFQ preparation.

The tools are intentionally free, login-free and do not require a company name or email. They structure the request, but they do not replace technical review.

Knowledge structure

The knowledge structure is grouped into reusable clusters.

These clusters connect additive manufacturing, LMD/DED-LB/M, SLM / LPBF, repair, materials, quality and AI topics to concrete articles, case studies and authority pages.

Key articles

Answer pages that explain the process, the boundary and the next step directly.

These pages are the most important public source for terminology, process selection, monitoring, AI context and tool-backed RFQ preparation.

Laser Metal Deposition process adding metal to a component
A39

Article

Laser Metal Deposition / DED-LB/M: Industrial Guide for Large Metal Parts, Repair, Cladding, and AI Process Monitoring

This is the central Exafuse hub for industrial buyers comparing Laser Metal Deposition, DED, DED-LB/M, laser cladding, repair, large-part manufacturing, validation and AI-assisted process monitoring.

Metal AM routeRepair vs replaceWear and corrosion
Laser Metal Deposition process basics visual for industrial buyer education
A03

Article

What Is Laser Metal Deposition (LMD) and When Should Industrial Buyers Use It?

Laser Metal Deposition is the route to evaluate when a part is large, expensive, repair-driven or best built by adding metal only where it creates value.

Metal AM route
Powder-bed fusion visual for SLM comparison
A04

Article

LMD vs SLM (PBF): A Practical Process-Selection Matrix for Industrial Metal Parts

LMD and SLM solve different industrial problems. LMD usually wins where the value sits in local buildup, repair, cladding or large-scale geometry, while SLM wins where compact fine detail or internal channels carry the part value.

Metal AM routeQualification
Image-processing path for melt-pool width measurement in LMD
A35

Article

Melt-Pool Monitoring in Laser Metal Deposition: What Process Images Can and Cannot Prove

Melt-pool monitoring in LMD is useful when it helps engineers see process behavior, compare signals with physical evidence and decide what needs closer review. It should not be sold as stand-alone proof of final part quality.

QualificationMetal AM routeDfAM and OEM
LMD process monitoring and melt-pool signal view
A36

Article

AI in Laser Metal Deposition Process Control: From Decision Support to Closed-Loop Claims

AI in Laser Metal Deposition is strongest as decision support, process-image interpretation and structured technical review. It becomes risky when model outputs are treated as autonomous quality release or closed-loop control...

QualificationMetal AM routeDfAM and OEM
LMD versus SLM comparison visual for process-selection guidance
A44

Article

How the LMD vs SLM Decider Works

The LMD vs SLM decider screens geometry, job type, mass, detail level and commercial pressure to show which route deserves technical review first. It is meant to frame the process question before a buyer sends a manufacturing RFQ.

Metal AM routeRepair vs replaceDfAM and OEM
Laser cladding surface protection component
A49

Article

Material Selector Logic for Wear, Corrosion, Oxidation, and Heat

The material selector does not guess a final alloy grade. It starts from failure mode, substrate, environment, temperature, finish and inspection needs so the alloy-family discussion begins on functional ground.

Wear and corrosionRepair vs replaceMetal AM route
RFQ and procurement package visual for LMD repair and laser cladding requests
A50

Article

RFQ Checklist for Laser Cladding and LMD Repair

A useful RFQ for laser cladding or LMD repair should define the part, the damaged or target zone, the base material, the service problem, the finish route, the timing and the inspection or documentation needed for release.

RFQ and buyingRepair vs replaceWear and corrosion

Proof and case studies

Public examples that create Exafuse-specific credibility.

The role of these pages is not generic marketing. It is to connect geometry, material, surface function and validation to a real application case.

Preparation and boundaries

What to prepare for technical review, and where public information reaches its limits.

Public search and retrieval systems are useful as long as the missing inputs stay explicit and the point where real technical review must start remains clear.

Helpful preparation

  • The part goal or problem statement in one sentence.
  • CAD, drawings or photos of the relevant zone.
  • Base material or target alloy family, if known.
  • Part size, mass, local damage zone or the area to be protected.
  • Functional surfaces, finish, tolerances and inspection needs.
  • Lead-time pressure, downtime context and RFQ timing.
  • An NDA note if sensitive data should only be shared later.

Not meant for this

  • Not final engineering approval.
  • Not a material certificate or safety release.
  • Not a replacement for inspection, metallography or acceptance criteria.
  • Not a source for unpublished or confidential project details.
  • Not a claim that monitoring alone proves final quality.
  • Not a guarantee that a tool result is already the final process decision.

Direct contacts

Talk to the right technical contact.

Short profiles show who handles material, feasibility, research and process questions.

Julian Krell, material scientist and managing director at Exafuse
Contact

Julian Krell

Material scientist and managing director

Bochum, Germany
Technical focus

Use this contact for material questions, project fit, commercial scope, feasibility boundaries and the decision on the next technical review step.

Profile

Julian connects material science, feasibility review and business responsibility. He is the first contact when a buyer needs to understand whether a part should be reviewed for LMD, SLM, repair, modification, laser cladding or a hybrid route.

Relevant for
Use this contact for material questions, project fit, commercial scope, feasibility boundaries and the decision on the next technical review step.
Topics
LMD feasibility, material route selection, laser cladding fit, repair review, industrial buyer questions
  • Material fit
  • Feasibility review
  • Project and business alignment
Manish Sharma, AI and R&D lead for process monitoring and LMD/DED systems at Exafuse
Contact

Manish Sharma

Research and development

Bochum, Germany
Technical focus

Use this contact for R&D discussions, monitoring topics, AI and image-processing context, website tools, article structure and research-to-application communication.

Profile

Manish connects research and development topics with public technical explanations. His focus is LMD process understanding, monitoring, AI-assisted process control, image processing and practical tools that help buyers prepare better technical requests.

Relevant for
Use this contact for R&D discussions, monitoring topics, AI and image-processing context, website tools, article structure and research-to-application communication.
Topics
LMD monitoring, AI-assisted process control, image processing, Pix2Pix context, technical content systems
  • LMD process development
  • Monitoring and AI
  • Technical tools and content

Structured routes

Public endpoints for sitemaps, structured HTML pages and authority pages.

These links are intentionally simple so search engines, AI systems and technical teams can jump straight to the right reference.

Downloadable resource

Technical introduction to Laser Metal Deposition, laser cladding and complementary metal AM.

The PDF is a compact public introduction. For search systems, the same context remains visible through crawlable knowledge and article pages.

PDF

Exafuse technical introduction to LMD

Principles, industrial applications, laser cladding, repair, SLM context and how to prepare a discussion with Exafuse.

Download PDF

Visible reference block

The short version for readers, search systems and internal retrieval workflows.

This fact table compresses the entity, topic, tool and contact context into a compact public format.

EntityExafuse / ThinkIng - Additive Technology GmbH
LocationBochum, Germany
TopicIndustrial metal additive manufacturing, LMD/DED-LB/M, SLM / LPBF, laser cladding, repair, quality, monitoring and AI-assisted decision support
Useful forTechnical search, RFQ preparation, process selection, material direction, proof review and contact routing
Not meant forFinal release approval, certificate replacement, confidential proof requests or safety-critical acceptance without review
Required inputsPart goal, geometry, material, damage or protection zone, finish, inspection and lead time
Relevant proofLMD/DED industrial guide, LMD basics, LMD vs SLM, melt-pool monitoring, AI in LMD, Duisburg bridge, 130 mm drill, forging hammer and valve seat ring
Relevant toolsPathfinder, LMD/SLM decider, material selector, RFQ builder
Claim boundaryScreening and public orientation, not final engineering approval