Industrial metal additive manufacturing, repair, laser cladding and technical project support.
About Exafuse
Metal additive manufacturing for parts where standard routes fall short.
Exafuse engineers and manufactures solutions for large, complex and high-value metal components. We combine materials engineering, a purchased CNC-based LMD platform, a purpose-built robotic LMD system developed in-house, SLM/LPBF, process development and inspection planning—from the first feasibility question to a repeatable manufacturing route.
Clients speak directly with the engineers assessing their project. New enquiries are reviewed quickly so that missing information and the most useful next step become clear early.
The part defines the route—not the machine already on the floor.
Start with the part goal, function and technical uncertainty.
The first discussion does not need confidential drawings. Non-confidential facts are often enough to choose the right process and the right technical contact.
Material, machine, process and inspection treated as one connected task.
Exafuse is the metal additive manufacturing brand of ThinkIng - Additive Technology GmbH. The company was established in 2019 from the research and start-up environment around Ruhr University Bochum.
From the beginning, the team understood that demanding metal-AM projects do not end at the laser. Material compatibility, component access, kinematics, heat input, path planning, fixturing, post-processing and inspection all determine whether an experiment can become a reliable manufacturing route.
Exafuse was therefore not built as a conventional print bureau. Our purpose is to engineer the complete route around the component and, where required, adapt the machine, sensing or software to the task.
Materials engineering
Dr.-Ing. Julian Krell
Co-founder and Managing Director Julian Krell completed his doctorate in materials engineering at Ruhr University Bochum. His materials background shapes how Exafuse assesses alloys, heat input, wear, finishing and the evidence required for a component.
Control and process data
Manish Sharma
Manish Sharma was involved in the company’s technical development from the beginning and joined as an engineer. His master’s work at Ruhr University Bochum focused on control systems for Laser Metal Deposition. Today, he works particularly on LMD/DED process development, process monitoring, image analysis and data-supported process assessment.
The combination of materials engineering, control and data engineering, and machine development remains central to the way Exafuse works.
Technical development
We built the technology around the task.
Our equipment evolved in response to real component constraints. Each expansion addressed a different limit: more scale, more freedom of movement or more geometric detail.
2019/2020
CNC-based LMD for large build-up
For large-scale material addition, repair and circumferential cladding, Exafuse bought its first CNC-based LMD platform. Additional rotary axes support rotational applications, while scanning, path planning and process observation were treated as parts of the complete system from the outset.
2022
Robotic LMD for complex geometry
Complex contours, changing processing angles and difficult-to-reach surfaces required additional degrees of freedom. Exafuse therefore began developing and building its own robotic LMD system. Robot, positioners, fixturing, scanning, sensing, path planning and control are configured as one coordinated system around the component.
2024
SLM/LPBF for compact detail and internal features
Since 2024, SLM/LPBF has complemented the large-format LMD routes. Powder-bed manufacturing suits applications where fine features, internal channels, lattice structures or compact functional integration matter more than high-volume local material addition.
Exafuse can now assess three distinct routes. The right choice depends on component function, geometry, material, post-processing, quantity and the evidence required for the application.
From an open research question to a manufacturing route
Research, engineering and component manufacturing remain connected within one project context.
Technical knowledge does not have to be rebuilt at every handover. Not every project needs all five stages; we recommend only the work required to support a sound decision.
1
Define the objective and risk
We align the component function, base material, geometry, load, quantity, timing and inspection or acceptance needs.
2
Establish feasibility
Where a direct manufacturing quotation would be premature, the material and process direction can be tested through calculations, coupons, test walls, demonstrators or controlled trials.
3
Develop the process and system
Parameters, path strategy, fixturing, scanning, sensing, monitoring and, where required, the kinematics or machine concept are adapted to the application.
4
Manufacture the part or prototype
Depending on maturity, the result may be a trial part, functional prototype, demonstrator or customer component with planned post-processing.
5
Define inspection and handover
Inspection features, documentation and acceptance criteria are aligned with the component function and project risk.
Research evidence and production release remain separate.
When a research direction becomes a commercial customer project, scope, quotation, responsibilities, deliverables and acceptance criteria are defined as a separate assignment. Where external specialists perform machining or inspection, the interfaces and responsibilities are stated transparently in the project scope.
Research with an industrial direction
Public projects show the technical questions we investigate systematically.
BreitbahnDED
BreitbahnDED investigates wider and more uniform LMD/DED tracks, multispot optics, process stability and control with the aim of making large-area deposition more productive and more controllable.
EIS-KW connects additive tooling concepts with intelligent cooling and heat management for forging tools. The project treats SLM/LPBF, LMD, sensing, temperature control, wear assessment and industrial validation as one connected challenge.
The first review stays practical: part, material, function and risk.
Process selectionLMD, SLM/LPBF, repair, laser cladding and additive-subtractive manufacturing are assessed against geometry, substrate, function, finishing and inspection scope.
Direct alignmentEarly questions can go directly to Julian or Manish before sensitive drawings or customer data are shared.
Documented project examplesCase studies, equipment data, material selection and inspection steps show how technical decisions were made for specific components.
NDA-friendly startStart with non-confidential facts. Detailed data, drawings or customer names can follow after NDA alignment.
Direct technical responsibility, short coordination paths and an honest process recommendation shape the first review.
01
Direct access to the technical leads
You speak with the people who assess the material, process, equipment route and project scope. Important context is not diluted through multiple sales and handover layers.
02
A fast, useful first response
New enquiries normally receive a response within 24 hours on business days. It confirms our understanding, identifies missing information and recommends a useful next step; it is not automatic feasibility approval.
03
Short decision paths
We combine the short decision paths of a technology-driven start-up with clear engineering responsibility.
04
System-level development
When a standard process is not enough, we also assess component access, kinematics, fixturing, scanning, path planning, sensing, monitoring and control.
05
An honest process recommendation
Our objective is not to force every enquiry into additive manufacturing or keep a particular machine busy. We identify technical limits, missing evidence and commercial risks early, then recommend the most robust route for the task.
We keep internal coordination lean—not the engineering review.
Start confidentially
An initial review does not require sensitive project files.
Anonymised information about the component, material, dimensions and objective is often enough to identify the next technical step.
What can stay out of the first message
Sensitive drawings, CAD data, customer names or process information do not need to be included in the first message.
How confidential data can follow
We do not require an Exafuse NDA template. Before confidential information is exchanged, we can review and sign suitable customer-provided confidentiality agreements. The file-transfer method and access arrangements are then agreed for the project.
The website intentionally does not provide a public upload field for confidential project files.
The clear division gives each brand a defined application focus, while the wider ThinkIng organisation brings together practical experience in metal and large-format polymer additive process chains.
Direct contacts
Talk to the right technical contact.
Julian Krell and Manish Sharma cover different technical questions and can be contacted directly.
Contact
Julian Krell
Material scientist and managing director
Bochum, Germany
Technical responsibility
For material selection, feasibility and project scope.
Julian reviews material direction, process feasibility and the commercial scope needed for a technically useful quotation.
Material selection
Feasibility review
Project scope
Contact
Manish Sharma
Industrial AI and decision systems
Bochum, Germany
Technical responsibility
For process monitoring, image analysis and LMD/DED data context.
Manish handles R&D discussions on process monitoring, image analysis and data-supported LMD/DED evaluation.