LMD or SLM decider
Assess whether scale, repair or fine detail drives the process choice.
This is an early process-selection aid. Final choice depends on material, finishing and inspection.
Inputs
Part geometry and job type.
Use approximate dimensions and job type to compare LMD, SLM or a hybrid route.
Enter only the information already available. The result is an initial direction, not a technical release. Nothing is sent unless you choose to contact Exafuse.
Inputs
Assess the geometry.
These fields are enough for an early LMD, SLM or hybrid direction.
Assessment
Result and practical next step.
The assessment follows the inputs so longer results remain easy to scan.
Further reading
Guides for comparing LMD, SLM/LPBF and hybrid routes.
These pages explain how geometry, application, mass and detail influence the choice between LMD and SLM/LPBF.
Technical guide
How the LMD vs SLM Decider Works
The LMD vs SLM decider compares the job type, dimensions, mass and required detail to identify which process should be reviewed first.
Open guide
Technical guide
Example: Choosing LMD for a Large Repair Component
A large repair component often points toward LMD rather than SLM when local geometry must be restored on an existing part and machining and inspection can follow deposition.
Open guide
Technical guide
Example: Why SLM Fits Compact Internal-Channel Geometry
SLM / LPBF is usually the stronger candidate when compact geometry, internal channels and fine integrated detail define the part.
Open guide